N&T Candidate Guide Responses

For those without a subscription to the News & Tribune, below are my responses to the questions in the election guide.

Relative experience:

BS Mechanical Engineering from the University of Evansville

Licensed Engineer in Training (EIT) – State of Indiana

Current member Floyd County Board of Zoning Appeals

Former member of New Albany Board of Zoning Appeals

Social media: facebook.com/SWforNA

 

  1. Why are you seeking this office, and what makes you the most qualified candidate for this position? 

My experience and background as a mechanical engineer easily makes me the most qualified for this position. My engineering career has involved project design, budgets, project management and root cause analysis problem solving. This gives me a unique skill set which sets me apart from all the other candidates. I have the ability to fully understand infrastructure projects and project their future consequences. I also have experience and a deep understanding of preventative and predictive analytics which should be used to forecast areas such as paving, and the necessary replacement of Fire & Police vehicles as well as critical equipment.

 

I’m seeking this office to be a responsive representative for the citizens of New Albany. My desire to seek office began when I forced to become involved in the Mt. Tabor Road project as a property owner. I had to push hard to get basic information from the city administration. Items such as project drawings, schedules and scope for the project were not freely given to the residents who live inside the project footprint. Through that information I discovered that the original traffic study that served as the basis for the change to the intersection at Klerner Lane was incorrect. My efforts forced the city to follow state and federal guidelines which are in place to protect the property owners. We’ve recently had a similar project on Main Street where the small business owners were not involved. I want to avoid these experiences moving forward. As an elected representative on the council, I will go above and beyond to inform, involve and meet the needs of those affected by these major projects.

 

  1. What are the top three issues facing New Albany, and how would you work to address them if elected?  

After meeting with many of our neighbors throughout the city, the top issues have become clear; safe, well maintained, correctly designed roads & sidewalks, protecting private property from damage due to Storm Water runoff and responsiveness from elected representatives and city officials.

Maintaining the condition of streets and sidewalks begins with cataloging their current condition. This data must include the last paving date (or replacement for sidewalks), logging any cuts made by utility companies and any other reported damage. With this information along with the traffic load, paving needs can be predicted and included in the budget. I will also work with the city engineer and Board of Works to create a reconstruction standard for utility cuts including periodic inspection & responsibility for their future repairs.

Proper road design for our major routes is the best method to reduce the traffic load in our neighborhoods and enhance their safety. I plan to use my problem solving expertise to ensure that Grant Line Road, Charlestown and State Street are operating properly. This will encourage more drivers to use these three main thoroughfares and avoid using neighborhood cross streets. Frustrated drivers from our poorly operating main roads are the root cause of the unsafe cut-through traffic in our neighborhoods.

To solve storm water runoff we must dedicate funds to add curbs, gutters and drains to areas which experience the worst flooding. I will also push for the creation of additional collection basins to areas with extensive hard surfaces. The Corp of Engineers has recently updated their study on the watersheds in the city. Their suggestions must be acted upon.

The solution to the lack of responsiveness by city officials is to make personal connections a priority. The elected officials and city employees are here to serve the citizens. Each and every inquiry must be acted upon to the best of everyone’s ability. Well justified and defendable reasons must be presented if the issue is unable to be solved completely. I pledge to be accessible, available and responsive to those I represent.

 

  1. Beyond the issues already mentioned, what’s a cause that’s important to you that you would champion if elected?  

Transparency through the focus of information availability is something that I will champion.

The city must be proactive in the posting of relevant information on websites and other easy to access locations. The online locations must be consistent, easy to navigate and intuitive. The timely posting or distribution of minutes and agendas for all public meetings is a hard requirement.

I will push for every public city meeting to be live streamed and the recording maintained for anyone to watch. Meeting times must also include alternative hours to allow opportunities to those who can’t normally attend.

We must involve residents, especially those directly impacted, on the design, development and scheduling of infrastructure projects. They must have their concerns addressed appropriately and keep them up to date as the project moves forward.

To ensure these items are met, I will request that all communications be handled in house for expediency and consistency.

We must remember that the elected officials and city employees are here to serve the public, be good stewards of their resources and provide a city government that meets their needs.

Reflections on the Primary

Reflections on the Primary

It’s been a little more than 24 hours since my first primary – time to reflect and look ahead.

First of all, thank you to everyone who’s taken a moment to speak with me, displayed a yard sign and voted.

I’d also like to thank those who have become mentors, sounding boards and “tour guides” so to speak for my campaign. I won’t name them here but will down the road after getting their blessing.

Onto the election results, I wasn’t sure what to expect since I started the process as an unknown. I had expectations of getting only a handful of votes, especially since the Republican ticket didn’t have any contested races. Needless to say I am very encouraged with the final count.

I am in this race to win it. I made the choice to file as a candidate. I didn’t have anyone pushing, prodding, pleading, begging or paying for me to enter. I decided to stay in the race even after coming in second in the caucus for the seat vacated by Dr. Knable.

I’m not a politician; I’m a citizen who wants change, better planning and thought for the future – something that I pledge will not waver.  As an engineer I am uniquely equipped with the skillset and experience to understand the issues, research the options and understand the solution.  - I will represent you - I ask for that opportunity in November.

The overarching focus of that change is transparency. We’ve had a few examples by the current administration of the lack thereof in the recent weeks. However my vision of transparency is more than just streaming meetings, it is the easy availability of current and accurate information. I’m a data and facts person – I want to be able to research the subject and develop a defendable position. Anything less is unacceptable. Recently a coworker came to me with a zoning question knowing I had served on the Board of Zoning Appeals. I helped guide him to the posted “new” zoning code only to find out that the online version did not include changes made during a zoom council meeting in 2021. You deserve better from the city – I will fight to give it to you.

As the campaign moves to the next phase I am looking for volunteers. Please take a moment to signup on my website – SwforNA.com or send me an e-mail at Scott@SWforNA.com.

If you would like to make a donation please head HERE

I look forward to seeing everyone on the campaign trail.

Whalen for City Council Yard Sign

Signs – Signs…

Signs - Signs, Everywhere there are Signs!

Sign, sign

Everywhere a sign

Blockin' out the scenery….

The Five Man Electrical Band’s lyrics still hold true today – 53 years later.

 

At the moment, there is one sign on my mind – Mine!

 

It’s hard to believe it’s time for early voting for the primary. This means election signs popping up everywhere like dandelions in an Indiana meadow. I know you have noticed. Lucky for everyone there is only one contested race, so the number of sign sightings should be down.

 

I don’t have to win the primary to make the general election. However being new to the game, I’m planning on distributing a good number of signs. I need to use the opportunity to get my name out there. I need to use every opportunity be noticed and most importantly remembered. If you have a spot to display one, please contact me!

 

Being noticed & remembered is one key in the election cycle. I chose to make my logo and signs different than the norm, it was a risk, but from the feedback I’ve received it has succeeded. The black background hasn’t been used very often and so far in this cycle mine is the only one. I had to choose red for the contracting color both due to the pop against the black, but also to pay homage to New Albany High School. The imagery of the Sherman Minton Bridge is due to a few reasons. First it is the anchor of the city, it is visible from nearly every area of the city, and I get a great view on my way to work near IUS every morning. Another reason is my engineering background; bridges are the cornerstone of infrastructure in the US and engineers make that happen. Finally, it symbolizes what I intend to be on the council. I will be a bridge between you and the city. It is why I’m running. To accomplish that, it will require the fulfillment of my campaign principles - Transparency, Accountability and Integrity.

 

Please give me your thoughts on my logo/signs. Have they caught your eye, would you like to post a sign? Comment on my Facebook page or drop me an email at Scott@SWforNA.com.

 

I also invite you to please visit the “Sign Up / Stay In Touch” section on my website to volunteer, request a sign or to sign up to receive my forthcoming newsletter. Please also consider making a donation to my campaign. There are links at the bottom of my home page. I look forward to meeting everyone during the campaign. As a side note I may be in my “alternate” light grey shirts during the warm weather!

Their only Transparency is their Weak Argument

Their only Transparency is their Weak Argument

Council Meeting 3/16/23

Have you ever argued with someone regarding the color of the sky? Well, it was a similar debate last night at the New Albany City Council meeting.

District 5 Councilman Josh Turner presented a fairly benign resolution requesting the other city boards and commissions to find a way to live stream their public meetings within the next 30 days.

The Facts – The council meetings for the last year have been streamed from the new chambers in city hall with somewhat acceptable success. (Last night’s meeting should be available for view here) The object of the resolution was to use the same process and technology afforded to the council.

The debate that followed was dominated by 2nd District CM Adam Dickey. Mr. Dickey is the current Chairman of the Floyd County Democrat Party, so it is safe to assume that his aversion to transparency is the party’s stance – he and the other party members in attendance chose to abstain from the vote. The resolution failed 3-0-5 with Mr. Turner, Mr. Blair & Ms. Griffith voting yes. Republican at-large representative David Abersold joined the Democrats in abstention.

Oddly enough his “arguments” against were the most transparent the Floyd Democrats have been in a long time (psst - I’m saying they were weak).

The arguments ranged from “staff resources” aka someone to hit the button to go live (nearly all of the other meetings are during staff hours), what is the process, what about the cost to let’s wait until the state mandates it.

Well let’s touch on each of these;

Staff & Process – The city employs an IT Director. It is reasonable to say that this is 100% within their duties. It is sensible to expect them to write a robust procedure on how to use the equipment to steam any meeting held in the chambers. If need be they can flex their hours like the rest of the world to help out in person.

Cost – There is a current “system” in place, no new equipment needs to be purchased at this time. Also, in all practicality there is no or very little cost to stream video these days. Internet data is unlimited and the resolution was to LIVE stream, not to store and stream on demand where some minimal costs could be in play.

State Mandate – The information that the in the current state session there is some legislation to mandate (and I would assume specify some minimum requirements) streaming. Mr. Dickey didn’t want to start doing something that won’t meet the mandate. I can tell you right now that using two fisheye security cameras won’t meet the requirement. Let’s get the process down and ready for the new equipment that will be required.

Where I stand – My campaign is based on three principles – the first of which is Transparency. A live streamed meeting is a simple way to start meeting this benchmark. Nearly every church in the country provides a live stream of their services, schools live stream sports events, our local school board does a really decent job streaming their board meetings - the technology is established. The only reason for a government entity to not stream is to prevent ease of public access. The city representatives against this technology should be embarrassed, the citizens should demand more.

What’s the bottom line? – Just like trying to argue that the sky isn’t blue – there is no way to justify the argument not to live stream meetings. You must ask yourself why the Floyd Democrats are against transparency.  When elected I will push to improve the equipment and provide a robust live stream process for all public city meetings.

The Remonstrance Process & the Intimidation that Followed

The Remonstrance process & the Intimidation that followed

By now the news that the remonstrance petition organized by current State Representative and mayoral candidate Ed Clere (requesting that the City revisit its $12.5M+ plans to build a new Police Station funded through a $1M annual expense from Sewer fees) failed to gather the required 500 signatures.  Time was working against this effort as, once published, there was just over a week to meet the deadline.

I was anticipating a response from the current regime, however a hand-addressed letter on official city letterhead with city taxpayers paying the postage was nowhere on my radar.

The targeting of a class of individuals with alternate political views by the chief of police is nothing less than intimidation. It also speaks volumes to the cowardice of the current mayor since the communication did not come directly from him or his campaign.

Chief Bailey claimed that the letter was sent to “clarify some untruths,” however it did nothing of the sort.

Here Are The Facts:  

The entire project was approved without publicly sharing any alternatives or reasons for or against the project. There was one option and one option only presented, and the mayor’s party members on the city council passed it. It may very well be that this project is the best option, but due to the aversion to clearly list and compare it to any alternatives, I have my doubts.

Let's take a look at the remonstrance process in Indiana and the purpose of the “stealthy” petition.

The process is defined in Indiana 6-1.1-20. There is a very informative flow chart located HERE.

To summarize, if the Common Council adopts a resolution or ordinance to issue bonds or enter a lease agreement to fund a project not exceeding $16,727,070 the remonstrance process may be used.

If the required number of signatures of registered voters or property owners is gathered (500 in this case) within 30 days of the passing of the ordinance, the issue goes to the public to decide.

At that point each side will make their case and the voters may decide.

This is the key aspect, and the reason I signed it. Lay your cards on the table and let everyone read your hand.

To say that looking at alternatives to a brand-new office building is against public safety is disingenuous. Hiring the correct number of officers, paying them a competitive and commensurate salary, providing top of the line training and equipment and promoting community relationships far outweighs a brand-new building with respect to its effect on public safety.

The Chief of Police and the Mayor owe the citizens of New Albany, and particularly the petition signers, a heartfelt apology and should personally reimburse the City fund for the taxpayer funds used to send out this piece of political intimidation propaganda.

 

I believe in Transparency, Accountability & Integrity and when elected, pledge to meet high standards in each area. The current administration continues to fall woefully short of these marks. It’s why you should be “All-In for WHALEN!

Main Street

Main Street Project

"The best-laid plans of mice and men often go awry." These words cannot be more true, however when it comes to the current administration, it is most often a stretch to apply. Their typical modus operandi is to focus on the "shiny thing" come hell or high water. Plans and schedules are not shared with the stakeholders, most likely because they are controlled by the contractor and have no penalties.  In nearly every occasion there is no true opportunity for those stakeholders who will be inconvenienced to provide input. They are the best to offer mitigation suggestions to lessen their disruption. This has been the case with the Main Street project, and has been with past projects such as Mt. Tabor Road, McDonald Lane, or Slate Run Road.

How will I improve these situations once in office?


  • Involve the stakeholders

  • Communicate with the stakeholders

  • Include as possible the stakeholders' suggestions

  • Post the contracts and hold the construction crews accountable

  • Post the plans and schedules on a regular basis

  • Push for an ordinance to take back financial oversight from the appointed boards on large projects


    How to address the Main Street Debacle?

    Unfortunately the business owners are carrying the brunt of the administration's failure on this project. At this point there is only one real solution - do everything possible to finish the project as soon as physically possible.


Only with true transparency will these projects succeed